Protestors Rally In Redwood City To Support Schools
Educate Our State Rally brings hundreds of advocates for local schools together in Courthouse Square.
Hundreds of local education advocates rallied in Courthouse Square in Redwood City this morning in an effort to show support for the state's public education system and increase awareness of the dire condition of the state's funding crisis.
Students, parents, local administrators and elected officials who joined together for an hour in front of the San Mateo History Museum at 7:30 this morning. Those who gathered waived signs, chanted, petitioned and spoke in favor of passing the tax extensions proposed by Gov. Jerry Brown to balance the state's budget in order to avoid cuts to the state public school system.
"We need a change. We need tax extensions. And we need a budget that doesn't cut schools one more time," said Shelly Masur, a Redwood City School District School Board member.
Gov. Brown has proposed extending $10 billion worth of taxes by gaining voters consent in the November election to balance the state's remaining budget gap, but he has faced resistance from conservative legislators who favor service cuts rather than taxes.
Similar rallies to the one in Redwood City took place in 20 other cities across the state, including Burlingame and San Francisco locally. The events were part of the Educate Our State protests, in which organizers attempted to gather support for Gov. Brown's ballot proposal, which features kindergarten-12 grade public school funds being spared from the budget chopping block.
Tia Knuedler, a Redwood City resident, sat with her son Rocky at the rally holding signs proclaiming a willingness to be taxed in order to prevent cuts from the school system.
"It's not that much money and its worth it to me because education is the most important thing for our kids," said Knuedler, whose son attends a public school in Redwood City.
Knuedler said she would be willing not only to support a tax to balance the state's budget, but also to vote in favor of a parcel tax that is being proposed locally to residents in the Redwood City School District.
Her sentiments were echoed by fellow Redwood City resident Tina Najbjerg, who held a sign that read "Zacramento, pleeze edukate mee!"
Najbjerg, who sends her child to a public school Redwood City, said she fears students will suffer should the state school system face funding cuts.
"I find it sad and disgusting," she said, of the unwillingness amongst some state residents and lawmakers to support the tax extensions.
Najbjerg was born and raised in Denmark, where she said the philosophy amongst citizens' willingness to accept taxation in return for social services is much different than in the U.S.
"In Denmark, when people are asked to support more taxes, they don't blink. People are more short sighted here," she said.
Redwood City City Councilwoman Rosanne Foust spoke briefly to the protesters and encouraged them to use technology such as text messaging to inform friends and members of the local business community of the dire state of the state education fund.
She also advocated for a collaboration between the local education advocates and business community to get the state budget passed.
Josh Griffith, principal at John Gill School in Redwood City, said the state of education funding was the worst he has ever seen in the nearly 30 years he has been working in the education system.
"Education is not a priviledge, it is a right," he said.
Many local students even joined the rally before classes began in order to advocate in favor of saving the programs at their schools that are at-risk of being cut should education funding get chopped.
Matthew Personette, a 12-year-old student at North Star Academy in Redwood City, said he feared the school would suffer in the future if the budget does not pass.
"I think we're going to lose our right to education," said Personette, who intends to participate in a bake sale to generate funds for local schools.
"This rally is going be effective, but I'm not sure if will do the full job," said Personette. "We needs to get our hands dirty."
Abby Hartzell, a 7th grader at North Star academy, also said she's afraid the school's music program will be cut if the budget crisis worsens.
Hartzell, who plays clarinet, said the high schools arts programs will suffer if the same kind of programs are cut at the elementary level.
Hartzell was collecting petitions with fellow school mates from protestors in favor of Gov. Brown's budget.
Megan Pockalny, a 15-year-old freshman at Woodside High School, handed out stickers and suckers to supporters. She said she was worried about the severe negative impact on students should cuts come to the public school system.
"Kids are the future, but if we don't get the money, the future in front of us will be ruined," she said.
Francis
5:42 pm on Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Blame the courts for the failure of the education system in not only California, but throughout America. The law says each State must educate the children of illegal aliens that have settled in that State. The schools are overcrowded, American students not learning in these cramped conditions. The money isn't there anymore. Our country is broke and our debt is owned by China and foreign investors. California especially is burdened with a 26 Billion dollar deficit, with the US Treasury carrying the worst obnoxious shortfall of $14.5 trillion dollars, yet we are still forced by law to educate children of foreign countries. This is just the tip of the iceberg of this massive issue. Other misinterpretation of judicial law is the 14th amendment that female when a baby is born becomes an instant citizen collecting cash payments, food stamps low income housing and free natal care. All this cost is assumed from your taxes and is in the hundreds of billions a year. Outside of Temporary worker program are the economic illegal aliens who come here to have their babies, and place an unimaginable strain also on the school system. But this is just part of the layers upon layers of foreigners, who are indirectly stealing tax payer’s money. America is importing poverty from other countries, not the needed highly qualified engineers and scientist. The Tea Party will deport illegal aliens through attrition, using the E-Verify and secure communities federal programs.
Natalie Scoma
9:58 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
You know why the RWC community don't want to support the RWC school district, esp. with the parcel tax? It's because people who live in RWC don't want to. The people running the district are short-sighted and unable to garner support because they pissed off enough of the key tax payers. Those people have enough to help out in more ways than just a parcel tax vote, but they send all their kids to private schools and donate their hard earned dollars their.
Jack Hickey
10:53 pm on Thursday, August 18, 2011
Schools are not overcrowded by historical standards. The period of smaller class sizes was an anomaly, created by State incentives, to justify the overbuilding of facilities fueled by State matching funds for Bond Measures.
The problem in public school classrooms has it's roots in Compulsory Attendance Laws. Maintaining discipline in classrooms requires willing participants, which is generally the case in private schools.
Empowering parents to choose from alternative sources for the education of their children is the solution. In other forums, I have proposed Property Tax Credits for Education, and Education Performance Vouchers. See: http://pave2010.com/
A small percentage of families (~12%) have made the decision to choose education alternatives for their children, usually at substantial cost, while still paying taxes to support the >$10,000/child public school system. Many sacrifice what others call necessities ($125 soccer shoes, smartphones, gas guzzling SUV's, fancy clothes, etc.) to pay for their choice. My modest proposals would facilitate their choice by allocating 1/2 of the $10,000 it would cost the public schools to educate their child.
It's a win win situation for taxpayers and families.
Steve Hayes
9:25 am on Friday, August 19, 2011
Jack -
You are living in a dream world where you are putting you own rather selfish tax saving interests above the interest of education. Your "plan" might get some traction if you put your interest in a gain aside and were willing to give families the average cost of sending kids to private schools - which is more than the cost of public schools (not half - the whole thing). The notion that privatization of schools will magically create huge savings is simply a fantasy.
You mention Compusary Attendance laws are bad - do you really think elementary school age kids should be given a choice about going to school?
One thing that has contributed to the cost of public education is the mainstreaming of students with all sorts of disabilities. One teacher I know had three autistic kids in a classroom of 24 last year. One of those kids cost the district an incremental $40K/yr because the student required a full time aid. What would your "plan" do for kids like that - would you push them back at the parents and tell them to to stop ordering lattes?
Jack Hickey
12:18 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011
Steve, I take it that we agree that schools are not overcrowded, and that private schools can more readily maintain discipline because parents have chosen them. Parents are the voice of children while their voice evolves. It should be presumed that parents will act in the best interest of their child. Compelling them to send their children to school is unnecessary and counter-productive, unless proven otherwise.
If government is to fund the education of our children it should be equal funding for all. $10,000/year per child is more than enough!
With ~12% of the student population engaged in alternatives to the public school system, a $5,000 encouragement for parents who choose alternatives would likely raise that percentage to well over 50%. The reduction in public school enrollment would free up facilities and teachers to be absorbed by the alternative education providers. And, the savings could be used to reduce the sales tax. My Performance Accountability Voucher for Education envisioned a phase out of the sales tax over a 20 year period. It also would phase out the $5,000 Performance Voucher over that same time period. See: http://pave2010.com/
Jack Hickey
12:30 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011
Steve, my "interest" is nothing less than the restoration of family authority and responsibility for feeding, clothing and housing their children. This includes feeding their mind.
It may take a "village", but the choice should be theirs.